Cases 11 - 20 of 186
Daniels Ranch, LLC et al v. Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2022cv03099
Plaintiff:
Daniels Ranch LLC, Super Orchards II LLC, Quincy Ranch LLC and others
Defendant:
Farm Service Agency of United States Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas J Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Barton v. Litigation Practice Group PC et al
as 3:2022cv05483
Plaintiff:
Nathen W Barton
Defendant:
The Litigation Practice Group PC, Daniel S March, John Doe 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01180
Plaintiff:
Daniel Simaan
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bungie Inc v. Elite Boss Tech Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01112
Defendant:
Officer, LPD John Doe 1, Officer, LPD John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bungie, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Bungie Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
American Pacific Mortgage Corporation et al v. Everett Financial Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01088
Plaintiff:
American Pacific Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Everett Financial Inc dba Supreme Lending, Luke Welling, Matthew Thomas and others
Wolfire Games LLC et al v. Valve Corporation
as 2:2021cv00563
Defendant:
Valve Corporation
Plaintiff:
Daniel Escobar, William Herbert and Wolfire Games LLC
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Sean Colvin, Ryan Lally, Hope Marchionda and others
Interested Party:
Dark Catt Studios Holdings Inc and Dark Catt Studios Interactive LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Babare v. Sigue Corporation
as 2:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
Daniel Babare
Defendant:
Sigue Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oram v. Wilkie et al
as 2:2021cv00075
Plaintiff:
Cyril David Daniel Oram, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie and William A Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
