Cases 31 - 40 of 662
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, United States Bureau of Land Management and Laura Daniel Davis
Intervenor:
Peak Minerals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Digital Licensing et al
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Digital Licensing a Wyoming corporation doing business as Debt Box, Jason R. Anderson, Jacob S Anderson and others
Receiver:
Josias N. Dewey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
In re: Mitchell
as 23-7052
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL LEE MITCHELL
Respondent:
JASON CHENNAULT, Sheriff, Cherokee County and SARA HILL, Cherokee Nation Attorney General
United States v. Nitchman
as 23-8047
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE DANIEL NITCHMAN
Valle-Santana v. Garland
as 23-9555
Petitioner:
DANIEL VALLE-SANTANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Ion Solar LLC v. Bailey
as 2:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ion Solar LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Bailey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States v. Lara
as 23-6057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL MORALES LARA
Old Chicago II Franchising v. TAC Ventures et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Old Chicago II Franchising
Defendant:
TAC Ventures, WD Ventures, Cecil O'Brate and others
United States v. Fajardo-Torres
as 23-3049
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL FAJARDO-TORRES
Zaczkiewicz v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Michael Zaczkiewicz
Defendant:
Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel J. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
