Cases 41 - 50 of 380
Alholm v. Vrdolyak Law Group
as 1:2022cv01820
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alholm
Defendant:
Vrdolyak Law Group and Vrdolyak Law Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hill et al v. Cargo Runner Co.
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Leslie Hill, Daniel Quaca and Cheyenne Quaca
Defendant:
Cargo Runner Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shah v. PayPal, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00795
Plaintiff:
Vivek Shah
Defendant:
PayPal, Inc. and Daniel H. Schulman
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. Deere & Co.
as 3:2022cv50039
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brown Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Ostego Forestry Services
Defendant:
Deere & Co. doing business as John Deere
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company v. Osowski et al
as 2:2022cv02020
Plaintiff:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Defendant:
Christopher Osowski and Green Plains, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Olson v. Morrison et al
as 2:2021cv02315
Defendant:
Christen Morrison, Chris Morrison, Dana Morrison and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T Olson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Catenacci
as 1:2021cv06718
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Daniel V.T. Catenacci
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
