Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Clemens v. Egeck et al
as 2:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
John Clemens
Defendant:
Michael R Egeck, Steven M Weddell, Yolanda Daniel and others
Edington v. Arizona Governor's Council on Human Trafficking et al
as 3:2024cv08028
Petitioner:
Daniel C Edington
Respondent:
Arizona Governor's Council on Human Trafficking, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bird v. Lucid Autoglass and RV LLC
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bird
Defendant:
Lucid Autoglass and RV LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Marinelli v. Edgio Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv01170
Defendant:
Edgio Incorporated, Limelight Networks Incorporated, Robert A Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Marinelli
Petitioner:
Nathan Javari and Peter Frouws
Gerow v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2023cv01059
Plaintiff:
Eric Gerow
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Esfandiari v. Edgio Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv00691
Defendant:
Edgio Incorporated, Limelight Networks Incorporated, Robert Lyons and others
Plaintiff:
Mehran Esfandiari
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
