Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Umpa v. National Association of Realtors et al
as 4:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Daniel Umpa
Defendant:
National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Inc., BHH Affiliates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kensinger v. Parmele Law Firm, P.C. et al
as 6:2023cv03326
Plaintiff:
Christine Louise Kensinger
Defendant:
Parmele Law Firm, P.C., Chelsea Hisch, Cassie Langwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ost-Lasker v. White et al
as 4:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Lisa-Kathleen Ost-Lasker
Defendant:
Daniel White, Sandy Baldwin, Will Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Ost-Lasker v. White et al
as 5:2022cv06110
Plaintiff:
Lisa-Kathleen Ost-Lasker
Defendant:
Daniel White, Sandy Baldwin, Will Akin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
