Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Waterman v. Department of Children and Families
as 9:2024cv80443
Plaintiff:
Brandon Waterman
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families, Sarah Grebinar, Noah Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fether v. Geico Indemnity Company
as 8:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Darcie Fether
Defendant:
Geico Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
STARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04185
Plaintiff:
DARCY STARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilkins v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2023cv23253
Plaintiff:
Darcy Wilkins
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DARCY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21118
Plaintiff:
JOHN DARCY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLEMING v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08088
Plaintiff:
DARCY M FLEMING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRENNAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24745
Plaintiff:
DARCI BRENNAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GERDTS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19953
Plaintiff:
DARCY GERDTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08612
Plaintiff:
DARCY ELLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARSHALL-VALLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03136
Plaintiff:
MARINEKA DARCY MARSHALL-VALLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
