Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. Coweta County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Coweta County Sheriff's Office, Josh Joyner, Debra Found and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Escambia County
as 1:2023cv02886
Plaintiff:
Darius Matthews
Defendant:
Escambia County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Gwinnett County Detention Center
as 1:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Darius A. Matthews
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Escambia County Alabama Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Darius Matthews
Defendant:
Escambia County Alabama Drug Task Force and Det. Lt Talik Stables
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Lotti et al
as 1:2022cv04193
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Wright
Defendant:
Vincent A. Lotti, Darius Pattilo, Sabriya H. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Espinoza et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Darius Tucker
Defendant:
Dr. Espinoza and Dr. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kade v. Pattillo
as 1:2021cv04063
Plaintiff:
William Edward Kade, Jr.
Defendant:
Darius Pattillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Escambia County Sheriff Department
as 1:2021cv02960
Plaintiff:
Darius Matthews
Defendant:
Escambia County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. CITY OF MILLEDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2021cv00057
Defendant:
OFFICER DARIUS BINION and CITY OF MILLEDGEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
