Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wright v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange)
as 6:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Darius Deshon Wright
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MIDDLETON v. MOODY
as 4:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
DARIUS T MIDDLETON
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vitkus v. Carlton et al
as 1:2021cv24226
Plaintiff:
Darius Vitkus
Defendant:
Warden E. K. Carlron and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grayson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv01632
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Darius Grayson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Still v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv14087
Defendant:
Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Plaintiff:
Darius Still
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRADDY v. JONES
as 4:2017cv00478
Petitioner:
DARIUS BRADDY
Respondent:
JULIE L JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Prince v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01145
Petitioner:
Darius Antwan Prince
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodie v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00010
Petitioner:
Darius Woodie
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Remy v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2014cv81219
Plaintiff:
Darius Remy
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vitkus v. Holder et al
as 2:2013cv00116
Petitioner:
Darius Vitkus
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Mark Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
