Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Hope v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Haynes, Harley Lippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hope v. United States of America
as 0:2009cv61706
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Hope v. Price et al
as 0:2009cv61692
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
Adam R. Price, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, Christian Jiminez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hope v. United States of America
as 0:2008cv61537
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hope v. Freedom of Information Act Agency et al
as 5:2008cv00220
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
Freedom of Information Act Agency and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Hope v. Mitchell
as 0:2008cv60773
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
Mary M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hope v. Dept. of Corrections
as 0:2008cv60497
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hope v. Freedom of Information Act Agency et al
as 5:2008cv00130
Plaintiff:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Defendant:
Freedom of Information Act Agency and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Hope v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2008cv00115
Petitioner:
Darryl Solomon Hope
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
