Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DAUGHTRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv01611
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff:
BONNIE DAUGHTRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAUGHTRY et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv20047
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. DAUGHTRY and THE ESTATE OF JUANITA DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAUGHTRY et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv04809
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
In Re:
IN RE: PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)
Plaintiff:
FELICIA A. DAUGHTRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daughtry v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv15270
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Plaintiff:
Teresa V. Daughtry
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terry et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2014cv04306
Plaintiff:
Joseph Terry , Robert Bender , Daniel R Estrada, Sr. and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. , SANOFI-SYNTHELABO INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
