Cases 71 - 77 of 77
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00960
Defendant:
MICK MULVANEY, ANDREW WHEELER, DAVID BERNHARDT and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00408
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MDEWAKANTON BAND OF SIOUX IN MINNESOTA et al v. BERNHARDT et al
as 1:2019cv00402
Plaintiff:
Ross Torgerson, Terri Robertson-Torgerson and Mdewakanton Band of Sioux in Minnesota
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT and TARA KATUK MAC LEAN SWEENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00405
Plaintiff:
EL PASO COUNTY, TEXAS and BORDER NETWORK FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Defendant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, PATRICK M. SHANAHAN, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN and others
NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00062
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, JOHN GARNER, KEVIN BIANCHI and others
Defendant:
MICK MULVANEY, DAVID BERNHARDT, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Petitioner:
TRACY JENSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND CURAY RESERVATION v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00546
Plaintiff:
UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY INDIAN RESERVATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, RYAN ZINKE and others
Movant:
MARY CAROL M. JENKINS, ROGER KOCHAMPANASKEN, TARAH AMBOH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
