Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Crow v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65200
Plaintiff:
David F. Crow
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Welch v. May et al.
as 3:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
David F. Welch
Defendant:
Warden Harold May, Ashley D. Veach, Angela F. Raypole and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03074
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David F. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lance v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00549
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David F Lance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks v. Horn
as 1:2018cv00451
Defendant:
Daniel A Manion, Gregory Horn, Richard Posner and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weir v. Mount et al
as 3:2017cv00081
Defendant:
Mount, Randy Mount and Ram Restoration, LLC
Plaintiff:
Weir and David F Weir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sevilla v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2015cv02979
Plaintiff:
Jesus Sevilla
Defendant:
Ron O'Brien, David F. Zeyen and Laura R. Swisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wampler v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2015cv02514
Petitioner:
David F. Wampler
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20657
Plaintiff:
Vivian M. Hanson and David F. Hanson
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Raimondo et al v. Sprint Communications Company L.P. et al
as 1:2012cv01984
Plaintiff:
Leonard F. Raimondo and David F. Gardner
Defendant:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. , Qwest Communications Company, LLC , Level 3 Communications, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
