Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Benjamin Woodhouse v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Otis D Wright III, Fernando M Olguin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse et al v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Havensight Capital LLC, Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse, Havensight Capital L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
Hon. Manuel Real
Defendant:
Nike Inc., Facebook Inc., Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dr. David Harris, III v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00876
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. David Harris, III
United States of America v. Denise Harris et al
as 2:2016cv05613
Defendant:
Estate of David Harris, Does and Denise Harris
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Ismael Aldaz et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05642
Plaintiff:
Ismael Aldaz, Sr, Maribel Arambula, Eddie Badillo and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Shirley Brown v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv05765
Defendant:
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Does, Christopher David Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Brown
Ryan Rodriguez et al v. West Publishing Corporation et al
as 2:2005cv03222
Appellant:
Exec/Class Counsel Sandra Disner, McGuireWoods LLP, Finkelstein Thompson LLP and others
Intervenor:
Stephen Stetson
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan M Slomba, Audrey Juranek, Greg Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Kari Brewer, Ryan Rodriguez, Loredana Nesci and others
Petitioner:
Pamela Collins Dunmore and Richard A Bodmer
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Brian Schall, Anand L Daniell and Nicholas D Mermiges
Defendant:
Kaplan Inc and West Publishing Corporation
Special Master:
John Francis Carroll
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
