Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Critchley v. Kappos
as 1:2013cv00136
Plaintiff:
David John Critchley
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Microvention, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01465
Plaintiff:
Microvention, Inc.
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Shammas v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01462
Plaintiff:
Milo Shammas
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Intrexon Corporation v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01451
Plaintiff:
Intrexon Corporation
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
MannKind Corporation v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01421
Plaintiff:
MannKind Corporation
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Kineta Two, LLC v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kineta Two, LLC
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Baxter International, Inc. et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01316
Plaintiff:
Baxter International, Inc. and Baxter Healthcare S.A.
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Timex Group USA, Inc. v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01080
Plaintiff:
Timex Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Dana Limited v. Kappos et al
as 1:2012cv00887
Plaintiff:
Dana Limited
Defendant:
David Kappos and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Novartis AG et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Novartis AG and Novartis Pharma GmbH
Defendant:
David Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
