Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
David Lane et al v. DeWALT Industrial Tool Co. et al
as 5:2022cv01949
Plaintiff:
David Lane and Lorraine Anda
Defendant:
DeWALT Industrial Tool Co., Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. and Stanley Black and Decker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Lane v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv01022
Plaintiff:
David Lane
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Farhar v. Ontrak, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01987
Defendant:
Ontrak, Inc., Terren S. Peizer and Brandon H. LaVerne
Plaintiff:
Michael Farhar
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Alexander Yildrim
Petitioner:
Ibinabo Dick, David Lane, Detectives Endowment Association of the City of New York Annuity Fund and others
Nathan Hill v. State of California et al
as 8:2017cv00826
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, California Supreme Court, Sherri R. Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kinney v. Boren et al
as 3:2016cv06505
Plaintiff:
Charles Kinney
Defendant:
Roger W. Boren and David Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Provident Savings Bank FSB v. David Laning et al
as 5:2007cv00349
Plaintiff:
Provident Savings Bank FSB and Provident Savings Bank FSB
Defendant:
David Laning, David Laning and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. v. Laning et al
as 3:2007cv00527
Plaintiff:
Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Defendant:
David Laning and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In re Harmonic Inc. Securities Litigation
as 4:2000cv02287
Defendant:
Harmonic Inc. , Anthony J. Ley , Robin N. Dickson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Knollenberg , Hans-Peter Wild , Bruce Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
