Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Christophe de la Mar Chapman, v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In, et al
as 21-55445
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHE DE LA MAR CHAPMAN III, AHO, ISBC, PH. ESD
Defendant / Appellee: HONDA MOTOR CORPORATION, INC., a California Corporation, HONDA MOTOR CORPORATION, INC., American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Cargurus Corporation, a Cambridge, Massachusetts Corporation, ACURA MOTOR SALES, INC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honda Motor Corporation and others
Christophe de la Mar Chapman, III v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02516
Defendant: Kia Motors of America, Inc., Hyundai-Kia Automotive Group, Inc., Kia Motors North America Hyundai Motor America Corporation, Toyota Motors North America, Inc., Toyota Motors Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Christophe de la Mar Chapman, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Scott v. Randy Ground
as 12-55882
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID LEE SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
David Lee Scott v. Randy Grounds We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02494
Respondent: Randy Grounds
Petitioner: David Lee Scott
Scott v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv07760
Plaintiff: David Lee Scott
Defendant: Rapid American Corporation, H.B. Fuller Company, Union Carbide Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Scott v. Warden
as 10-73540
Petitioner: DAVID LEE SCOTT
Respondent: WARDEN
David Lee Scott v. Randy Grounds We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv06906
Respondent: Randy Grounds
Petitioner: David Lee Scott
David Lee Scott v. Randy Grounds
as 2:2010cv05744
Warden: Randy Grounds
Petitioner: David Lee Scott
David Scott v. B. Curry
as 08-55894
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID LEE SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: B. CURRY, Warden
David Lee Scott v. B Curry
as 2:2008cv00880
Petitioner: David Lee Scott
Respondent: B Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?