Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Davis et al v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01897
Defendant:
David Mar, Kim Adamson, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jody Bacon and Cody Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Snow v. David Mar, et al
as 18-16577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN OLIVER SNOW
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAR and E.K. MCDANIEL, Warden
Webb v. Aranas et al
as 3:2017cv00427
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Brian Borg, Barbara Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merry v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2016cv00164
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca, Karen Gedney and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel V. Merry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deverna v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2015cv00384
Defendant:
Romee Aranas, I. Baca, Brian Connett and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Wayne Deverna, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcelli v. Mar et al
as 3:2014cv00683
Defendant:
Nathan Hughes, David Mar, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Marcelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Espinosa v. Bannister et al
as 3:2014cv00668
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, James G. Cox, William Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Espinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCabe v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2014cv00346
Defendant:
Doctor Robert Arianas, Warden Isidro Baca, Doctor Robert Bannister and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Hill v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 14-15437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES H. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, CAMP, Dr., JIM BENNEDETTI and others
Garcia Lopez v. Mar et al
as 3:2013cv00636
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Roger Bannister, David Mar and others
Plaintiff:
Victoriano Garcia Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
