Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Carpenter v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv01927
Petitioner:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv50190
Petitioner:
Ricardo A. Garcia
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Mitchell
as 1:2023cv02725
Petitioner:
Elver Hernandez
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. Mitchell
as 4:2023cv04062
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumlin v. Mitchell
as 1:2023cv00638
Petitioner:
Marvin Sumlin
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reid v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv50036
Petitioner:
Denzel Reid
Respondent:
People of Illinois and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
LaShawn Russell
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMullen v. Mitchell
as 3:2022cv03072
Petitioner:
William McMullen
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamon v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Andrew Lamon
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Akins v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2022cv03349
Petitioner:
Francisco Akins
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
