Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Hernandez v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02429
Defendant:
Bri Courney, David Mitchell, Bri Kourney and others
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norington v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02410
Plaintiff:
David Norington
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Cheryl Crow, Christine Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wisnauski v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv02261
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wisnauski
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Travis Bayler, Dr. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v Blades et al
as 3:2023cv02221
Plaintiff:
Mark Davenport
Defendant:
Deb Bledsoe, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Percy Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muller v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02147
Plaintiff:
Samuel Muller
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Sgt Travested and Officer Stowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Exum v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Exum, Jr.
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, Percy Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv01927
Petitioner:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allan Kustok v. David Mitchell
as 23-2125
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLAN KUSTOK
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL, Warden, Pinckneyville Correctional Center
Ramirez et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv01850
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramirez and Ricky Hernandez
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv01851
Plaintiff:
Andres Ramirez and Ricky Hernandez
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Director IDOC and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
