Cases 41 - 50 of 433
Allan Kustok v. David Mitchell
as 23-2125
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALLAN KUSTOK
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MITCHELL, Warden, Pinckneyville Correctional Center
Exum v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01994
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Exum, Jr.
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Mitchell, Percy Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Nethanjah Breitenbach, Charles Daniels, James Dzurenda and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv16691
Plaintiff:
DAVID MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Clifford W Baker
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Wexford Health Services, Inc., John/Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv50190
Petitioner:
Ricardo A. Garcia
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maggio v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
Brian David Maggio
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Warden Dennison and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Hernandez v. Mitchell
as 1:2023cv02725
Petitioner:
Elver Hernandez
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Mitchell
as 3:2023cv01927
Petitioner:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Crayton v. Mitchell
as 4:2023cv04062
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
