Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Shamburger et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sydney Shamburger , Lewis Campbell, Jr. , Dennis Northcutt and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell et al v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv09985
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell and Victoria Mitchell
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castillo v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Arnold Castillo
Defendant:
Yolanda Johnson, David Mitchell and Ricardo Tejeda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. McClelland et al
as 3:2011cv00854
Defendant:
Lt McClelland, David Mitchell, Officer Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burkett et al v. Country Bank
as 4:2011cv04073
Plaintiff:
Rod Burkett , David Mitchell , JoEllen Bleavins and others
Defendant:
Country Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Johnson v. Delgado et al
as 3:2010cv00526
Plaintiff:
Terry C Johnson
Defendant:
Jose A Delgado, Roger E Walker, Donald Hulick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Menard, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03835
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox v. Randle et al
as 3:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
Michael Randle, Wendy Blake, John Garlik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Delgado et al
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Terry C Johnson
Defendant:
Jose A Delgado, Robert Newell, Tracy Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, the v. All Maintenance & Construction Inc et al
as 1:2009cv02892
Plaintiff:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, the
Defendant:
All Maintenance & Construction Inc, David Mitchell and Christine Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
