Cases 41 - 50 of 293
Huffman v. James T Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2017cv00314
Petitioner:
Fred Huffman
Respondent:
James T Vaughn Correctional Center, David Pierce and Attorney General for State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crumpler III v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00310
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Crumpler III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
Cornell Hester
Defendant:
David Pierce, Stacey Hollist, Ronald Hosterman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lampkins v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00281
Petitioner:
Japhis Lampkins, Sr.
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Parkell v. David Pierce, et al
as 17-1520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL, and the inmates of C-Building at JTVCC
Defendant - Non-Participating:
MAJOR PHILLIP PARKER, in his individual and official capacities and MAJOR DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities
Fisher, Jr. v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
James R. Fisher, Jr.
Defendant:
Philip Parker, Christopher Klein, Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Bishop
Defendant:
Phillip Parker, Steven Floyd, Winslow Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Petitioner:
Cesar C. Flores
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee Israel v. David Pierce, et al
as 17-1451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEE A. ISRAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN DAVID PIERCE and RONALD HOLCOME, Correctional Officer
Young v. Pierce et al
as 1:2017cv00192
Petitioner:
Idris Young
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
