Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
David HillIn re: David Hill
as 21-3978
Petitioner: In re: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Respondent: CHARMAINE BRACY, Warden, Warden
David HillIn re: David Hill
as 21-3830
Petitioner: In re: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Respondent: CHARMAINE BRACY, Warden
Hill v. Eppinger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01799
Petitioner: David Hill, David T. Hill and David Tyrone Hill
Respondent: Attorney General for the State of Ohio and Warden L. Eppinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Hill v. Olynyk
as 17-3174
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Defendant - Appellee: DR. OLYNYK
David Hill v. OH Dept of Rehabilitation, et al
as 16-3667
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Defendant - Appellee: OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, D. BRADLEY, SOCF J3N 41-630 Range, SHANNON BEAR, (SOCF) Corrections Counselor and others
David Hill v. Olynyk
as 16-3644
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Defendant - Appellee: DR. OLYNYK
David Hill v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab and Corr., et al
as 16-3121
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Defendant - Appellee: OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, et al
Hill v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00762
Plaintiff: David Tyrone Hill
Defendant: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Managing Officer, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, D. Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hill v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 15-3282
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID TYRONE HILL
Defendant - Appellee: GARY C. MOHR, Director of Rehabilitation and Corrections and ALAN J. LAZAROFF, Warden, Warden
Hill v. Mohr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02147
Plaintiff: David Tyrone Hill
Defendant: Gary Mohr and Alan Lazaroff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?