Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Thomas v. Davis
as 2:2020cv00071
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Davis
as 2:2020cv00066
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Davis
as 2:2020cv00012
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. City of Kingsville, Texas et al
as 2:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Thomas
Defendant:
City of Kingsville, Texas, Kingsville Police Department, Kleberg County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Torres et al -
as 3:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Thomas
Defendant:
Ricardo Torres, Kingsville Police Department, Ed Mata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Torres et al
as 2:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Thomas
Defendant:
Ricardo Torres, Kingsville Police Department, Ed Mata and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Anderson et al
as 4:2013cv01199
Defendant:
Mike Anderson, Pat Lykos and Jan Krocker
Plaintiff:
David Tyrone Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. United States Of America Documents should be parallel filed in criminal case #2:06cr259.
as 5:2009cv00140
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. United States Of America
as 2:2009cv00340
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:09cv148. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 2:06cr259
as 2:2009cv00148
Petitioner:
David Tyrone Thomas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
