Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
RHOADES v. RHOADES et al
as 2:2009cv00826
Plaintiff: CINDY L. RHOADES and ROBERT J. RHOADES
Defendant: DAVOL, INC. and CR BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
RIZZO v. DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00012
Plaintiff: LOUIS M. RIZZO, JR.
Defendant: DOYLESTOWN HOSPITAL, BRETT M. HARRISON and DAVOL INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
VON ESSEN v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv05553
Plaintiff: JENINE VON ESSEN
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KALTREIDER et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 5:2008cv05561
Plaintiff: SUSAN KALTREIDER and BRUCE KALTREIDER
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CRAMER et al v. DAVOL INC. et al
as 5:2008cv03915
Plaintiff: TAMMY CRAMER and SCOTT CRAMER
Defendant: DAVOL INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
PALANGE et al v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01828
Plaintiff: DONNA R. PALANGE and ALPHONSE A. PALANGE
Defendant: C. R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
STARR v. C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2008cv01538
Plaintiff: LORETTA STARR
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WARNER et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01537
Plaintiff: MICHELLE L. WARNER and TIMOTHY J. WARNER
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARTINEZ et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01210
Plaintiff: DELORIES L. MARTINEZ and MARIO MARTINEZ
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
HOCEVAR et al v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv01211
Plaintiff: LUISA HOCEVAR and LOUIS P. HOCEVAR
Defendant: C.R. BARD, INC. and DAVOL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?