Cases 1 - 10 of 755
Guotaiqixing Biomedical International (S) PTE Ltd. v. Dai
as 1:2024cv03142
Plaintiff:
Guotaiqixing Biomedical International (S) PTE Ltd.
Defendant:
Xuefeng Dai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Echevarria (Heyward)
as 24-1060
Defendant:
TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA, JONATHAN RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Authors Guild v. OpenAI Inc.
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
AUTHORS GUILD, DAVID BALDACCI, NICHOLAS A. BASBANES and others
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OPENAI, INC., OPENAI LP and others
Not Yet Classified:
PAUL TREMBLAY, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
United States of America v. Echevarria (Simmons)
as 24-938
Defendant:
NAQUANN SIMMONS, TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Day et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02675
Plaintiff:
Frank Day, Min Soon Day and Matthew Day
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ahmad v. Day
as 24-856
Plaintiff:
MAHFOOZ AHMAD
Defendant:
COLIN DAY, COURTNEY DUTTER, ICIMS INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
County Of Rockland et al v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority et al
as 7:2024cv02285
Plaintiff:
County Of Rockland and County Executive Edwin J Day
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority and Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
