Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01097
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02310
Plaintiff:
CAMPBELL COUNTY, HMA, LLC, DHSC, LLC, AMORY HMA, LLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv02110
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, LEXINGTON HOSPITAL CORPORATION, EMPORIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
AFFINITY HOSPITAL, LLC et al v. ALEX M AZAR II
as 1:2018cv01956
Plaintiff:
GADSDEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, DEACONESS HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, CLEVELAND TENNESSEE HOSPITAL COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M AZAR II and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Deaconess Health System LLC v. Key et al
as 5:2013cv00637
Plaintiff:
Deaconess Health System LLC
Defendant:
Craig S Key, Josh Anderson, Mary Jane Keiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Norman et al v. McBride et al
as 5:2012cv00890
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gerding Norman and Teresa Gerding
Defendant:
Matthew A McBride, Deaconess Health System LLC, Professional Corporation of Deaconss Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
