Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Hildebrandt et al v. Lovik et al
as 6:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Cody Dean Hildebrandt, Jefferson Warren Davis and Tylor Setzer
Defendant:
Tina Lovik and Mark Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craigen v. Gushwa et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
George W. Craigen
Defendant:
Dean Gushwa, Elizabeth Baker, O.P.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleury v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01753
Petitioner:
Dean Allen Fleury
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Burford v. McCahill et al
as 6:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Clayton Dean Burford
Defendant:
Conor McCahill, Keith Stein and Circuit Court of Oregon of Linn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Konikow v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00746
Petitioner:
Justin Dean Konikow
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Deschaine v. Cain
as 2:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Norman Dean Deschaine
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrasco Castaneda v. Larson et al
as 6:2022cv01577
Plaintiff:
Jaime Carrasco Castaneda
Defendant:
Tad Larson, Sheriff Joe Kast, Jonny Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01484
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCormick v. Oregon Employment Dept.
as 6:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
William Dean McCormick
Defendant:
Oregon Employment Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
