Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER, ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
AIKEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTERS, LLC et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., WELLINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, MCALLEN HOSPITALS, LP and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
In Re: ALLINA II-TYPE DSH ADJUSTMENT CASES
as 1:2019mc00190
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
In Re:
ALLINA II-TYPE DSH ADJUSTMENT CASES
Plaintiff:
COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER AUTHORITY, MISSISSIPPI BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, INC., ST. JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
WILLIAMSPORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00832
Plaintiff:
SMDC MEDICAL CENTER ESSENTIA HEALTH DULUTH, PALOMAR MEDICAL CENTER, SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
WILLIAMSPORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
WILLIAMSPORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SMDC MEDICAL CENTER ESSENTIA HEALTH DULUTH, SOLDIERS & SAILORS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
BURWELL and SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2009cv01447
Plaintiff:
ALTA BATES MEDICAL CENTER, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER-DAVIES, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER - PACIFIC and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Denial of Services (EMTALA)
ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER et al v. LEAVITT
as 1:2008cv02080
Plaintiff:
ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER, EDEN MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
