Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Nabavi v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv11719
Plaintiff:
Seyed Mahmoud Nabavi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and Denis C. Riordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv10826
Plaintiff:
Carmen Maria Garcia Smith
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Demidov v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10723
Plaintiff:
Andrey Demidov
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto R. Gonzales, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Sharma v. Riordan et al
as 4:2007cv40108
Plaintiff:
Ashok Kumar Sharma
Defendant:
Denis C. Riordan, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Yao v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10472
Plaintiff:
Yao Yao
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Denis C. Riordan and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Youssef v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv10448
Plaintiff:
George Abdallah Youssef and George Abdallah Youssef
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Shao v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv10423
Plaintiff:
Qiuyue Shao
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Denis C. Riordan and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Chicooree v. Riordan et al
as 1:2007cv10236
Plaintiff:
Amrishi Ashveen Chicooree
Defendant:
Denis C. Riordan, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Esmaeltajrishi v. Riordan et al
as 4:2007cv40026
Plaintiff:
Simin Esmaeltajrishi
Defendant:
Denis C. Riordan, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
