Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DSM Leasing, Inc., et al v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, I
as 11-13443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DSM LEASING, INC., CARY N. MARIASH, TWINSTAR PARTNERS, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DIAMOND AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Richard Dennis Rubin Enterprises, LLC v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
as 0:2011cv61676
Plaintiff:
Richard Dennis Rubin Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Leonard Edwards v. Dennis Rubin
as 11-7015
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Leonard Edwards
Defendant - Appellee:
Dennis Rubin, Fire Chief, DC Fire/EMS Department, District of Columbia Government and D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department
EDWARDS v. RUBIN et al
as 1:2010cv01579
Plaintiff:
LEONARD EDWARDS
Defendant:
DENNIS RUBIN and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mascaro Aviation, L.L.C. et al v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
as 0:2010cv60556
Plaintiff:
Mascaro Aviation, L.L.C. , Morris Aviation, LLC , DSM Leasing, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DSM Leasing, Inc. et al v. Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
DSM Leasing, Inc. , Cary N. Mariash , Twinstar Partners, LLC and others
Defendant:
Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDWARDS v. RUBIN et al
as 1:2010cv00452
Plaintiff:
LEONARD EDWARDS
Defendant:
DENNIS RUBIN and DC FIRE/EMS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Family Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-7024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
