Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Harris v. Smith
as 1:2008cv01064
Petitioner:
Donte Roland Harris
Respondent:
Dennis Smith, Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blow v. Smith et al
as 1:2008cv00383
Petitioner:
Jimmy Raymond Blow
Respondent:
Dennis Smith, Dennis Smith, Dennis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Blow v. Smith
as 1:2008cv00363
Petitioner:
Jimmy Raymond Blow
Respondent:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Smith
as 1:2008cv00355
Petitioner:
William D. Williams
Respondent:
Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sears v. Smith
as 1:2007cv01770
Petitioner:
John Sears
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Comito v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv01782
Petitioner:
Robert Comito
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Prison Camp, Atwater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Blow v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv01684
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Raymond Blow
Defendant:
Dennis Smith and USP Atwater Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Parman v. Gonzaga et al
as 1:2007cv01512
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Parman
Defendant:
Alicia Gonzaga, Dennis Smith, Robert E. McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harding v. Smith et al
as 1:2007cv01399
Petitioner:
Randall W. Harding
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01650
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
