Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Carroll v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00222
Petitioner:
Ryan Carroll
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hovannes v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00223
Petitioner:
Keshishyan Hovannes
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Magana v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00213
Petitioner:
Israel Magana
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sutton v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00211
Petitioner:
Clyde G. Sutton
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00190
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00189
Petitioner:
Marco A. Rodriguez
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
David Chen Pui v. Dennis Smith
as 1:2007cv00183
Petitioner:
David Chen Pui
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pedro DeRobles v. Dennis Smith, Et Al.
as 1:2007cv00177
Petitioner:
Pedro DeRobles
Respondent:
Dennis Smith, Dennis Smith, Kodger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Baldomero Guardiola v. Dennis Smith
as 1:2007cv00174
Petitioner:
Baldomero Guardiola
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Harding v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00133
Petitioner:
Randall W. Harding
Respondent:
Dennis Smith and Dennis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
