Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SWEIGERT v. BENASSI et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
D.G. SWEIGERT
Defendant:
MATTHEW BENASSI, U.S. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH, U.S. COAST GUARD and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
STATE OF INDIANA et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOSEPH R. BIDEN, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. PEAVLER et al
as 1:2019cv04804
Defendant:
WILLIAM ERIC MEEK and BOBBY PEAVLER
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PERALES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02268
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESERT-MOUNTAIN REGION -- BARSTOW OFFICE, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
OVERHAUSER LAW OFFICES, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2016cv01540
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
OVERHAUSER LAW OFFICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
GABRION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GABRION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LANDERS v. COPE et al
as 2:2014mc00003
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, BUREAU OF PRISONS EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DEAN LANDERS
IN RE: Jonathan Petersen and Pilgrim Financing LLC
as 2:2010cv00298
Petitioner:
Jonathan Petersen and Pilgrim Financing LLC
Respondent:
United States Attorney's Office, United States Attorney General and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
