Cases 1 - 10 of 18
NELSON v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv02947
Plaintiff:
LETAIYO NELSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BELL v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
PIUNTI v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv02074
Plaintiff:
KYLE PIUNTI
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WINDSOR v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON WINDSOR
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSHING vs. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
SHAUN RUSHING
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOOKER v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2021cv01691
Plaintiff:
CARLTON JR. HOOKER and CARLTON HOOKER, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WARD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
CLYDE E. WARD
Defendant:
ROBERT L. WILKE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
as 1:2020cv02449
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. SIMS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOOLASPRASHAD v. SHULKIN et al
as 1:2018cv00631
Plaintiff:
L. TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, PERRY HOLLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CALDWELL v. SHULKIN et al
as 1:2018cv00353
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROBERT CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
DAVID J. SHULKIN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, SUZANNE M. KLINKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
