Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant: BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff: JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Leopold et al v. U.S. Department of the Army We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff: Jason Leopold and Bloomberg L.P.
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee: MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee: JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
Mahoney et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01305
Plaintiff: Pamela Mahoney, Michael Mahoney, Lisa Solomon and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, U.S. Department of the Army and others
Intervenor Defendant: South Fork Wind, LLC
Amicus Curiae: New York State Public Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. Central Intelligence Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01542
Plaintiff: Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency, Department of the Army, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Rucker v. Esper
as 21-2540
Petitioner / Appellant: Randal Rucker
Respondent / Appellee: Mark T. Esper, Secretary of the Army Department of the Army, Mark Averill and The Honorable James Mattis
Defendant: Department of Army, Department of Defense and United States of America
United States of America v. Acquest Transit LLC
as 21-659
Defendant: United States Department of Defense Army Corps of Engineers, William J. Hochul, Jr., in his official capacity as United States Attorney for the Western District of New York, Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellant: Acquest Transit LLC, Acquest Development, LLC and Mr. William L. Huntress
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Martinez v. McCarthy, Acting Secretary, De
as 20-1746
Plaintiff / Appellant: Darlene Martinez
Defendant / Appellee: Jonathan Weisbrod, Ryan D. McCarthy, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army and Charles Michels
Rein v. Esper
as 19-842
Defendant / Appellee: Secretary Eric K. Fanning, United States Department of the Army, United States Department of Army, Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper, United States Department of the Army and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donna Rein

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?