Cases 1 - 7 of 7
FRANKLIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02203
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA D. FRANKLIN and JOSH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC., FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Banks, et al v. Quincy Booth, et al
as 21-5033
Defendant / Appellant:
Lennard Johnson, in his official capacity as Warden, D.C. Dept. Corrections and Quincy L. Booth, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Edward Banks, Eric Smith, D'Angelo Phillips and others
Interested Party:
United States
Amicus Curiae:
Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center
Edward Banks, et al v. Quincy Booth, et al
as 20-5216
Defendant / Appellant:
Lennard Johnson, in his official capacity as Warden, D.C. Dept. Corrections and Quincy L. Booth, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Dept of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Edward Banks, Eric Smith, D'Angelo Phillips and others
Interested Party:
United States
DUCKETT v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2011cv01521
Petitioner:
PHILLIP ERIC DUCKETT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES , U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS, DIRECTOR and D.C. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Vincent Rivera
as 10-5329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent Faustino Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense, Barack Obama, President, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Vice President and others
Thomas Harris v. Efforts/EFEC 1/2 Way House, et al
as 10-7074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas Edward Harris, also known as Bro. Abdul Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
Efforts/EFEC 1/2 Way House, Lt. Craig, Transportation Supervisor, DC Dept of Corrections/DC Jail, Kenard Johnson, Counselor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 97-7165
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
