Cases 1 - 10 of 11
JAMES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2022cv20421
Plaintiff:
DERRICK G JAMES
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON and DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00158
Petitioner:
DERRICK G JAMES
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. The GEO Group, Inc., et al
as 9:2022cv80298
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.,, Assistant Warden Lawrence, Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. The GEO Group, Inc., et al
as 2:2022cv14076
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.,, Assistant Warden Lawrence, Colonel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Columbia Correctional Institution
as 3:2019cv00939
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
Columbia Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2015cv22402
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
Davis, Morris and K.J. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv01068
Petitioner:
Derrick G. James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General for the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00422
Petitioner:
Derrick G. James
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2009cv20319
Plaintiff:
Derrick G. James
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
