Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bardy Diagnostics, Inc. v. Vital Connect, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Bardy Diagnostics, Inc.
Defendant:
Vital Connect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Franchi v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., James Fox, Lisa M. Giles and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Mancini v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00466
Defendant:
James Fox, Lisa Giles, Roche Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mancini
Stein v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00454
Defendant:
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., Lisa Giles, James Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Ravgen, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. et al.
as 1:2020cv01646
Defendant:
Foundation Medicine, Inc., Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ravgen, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CareDx, Inc. et al v. Tai Diagnostics, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00486
Plaintiff:
CareDx, Inc. and The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University
Defendant:
Tai Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ascenda Biosciences, LLC v. Little
as 1:2020cv00278
Defendant:
Perry Little
Plaintiff:
Ascenda Biosciences, LLC
Counter Defendant:
The Strategic Group, P.R. and Provista Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
McCullough et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2018cv01829
Defendant:
William Austin Lewis, Dr. John Abeles, Joel Kanter and others
Plaintiff:
Robert McCullough, Jr. and Dr. Zhongxi Zheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guardant Health, Inc. v. Personal Genome Diagnostics, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01623
Plaintiff:
Guardant Health, Inc.
Defendant:
Personal Genome Diagnostics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Telomere Diagnostics, Inc. v. Titanovo, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00955
Plaintiff:
Telomere Diagnostics, Inc.
Defendant:
Titanovo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
