Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Houston Casualty Co. et al v. Ambitious Line SA et al
as 3:2024cv02292
Plaintiff:
Houston Casualty Co. and Green Diamond Resource Company
Defendant:
Ambitious Line SA, Shikishima Kisen KK and M/V Grove Island
Franklin et al v. PacifiCorp
as 2:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Eric Franklin, Kerry Emmerson, Katrina Garcia and others
Defendant:
PacifiCorp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Nathan Smith v. GIA et al
as 2:2021cv03242
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Jennifer Wilson, Susan Jacques, Nathan Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosete v. Diamond Resorts Hawaii
as 3:2019cv08418
Plaintiff:
Consepcion Arana Rosete
Defendant:
Diamond Resorts Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond Property Management, Inc. v. Chung Suh
as 2:2019cv02212
Plaintiff:
Diamond Property Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Chung Suh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Troy Diamond v. Edgardo Ramirez et al
as 2:2016cv07980
Plaintiff:
Troy Diamond
Defendant:
Does, Diolivia Lopez Olea and Edgardo Ramirez
Diamond Real Estate et al v. American Brokers Conduit et al
as 3:2016cv03937
Plaintiff:
Diamond Real Estate, Porfirio P. Jorque and Editha Palancia
Defendant:
American Brokers Conduit, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. , American Home Mortgage Acceptance, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Manuel Jones v. Diamond Burke et al
as 2:2014cv07981
Defendant:
Diamond Burke and Does
Plaintiff:
Manuel Jones
Flint et al v. Krause et al
as 3:2011cv00480
Plaintiff:
Diamond P. Flint and David J. Pelkey
Defendant:
Stefan Krause, Charles Noski, Mark Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Diamond Essentials, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Marc C. Lewis
Defendant:
Diamond Essentials, Inc., Emerald Mortgage, Kiley Kruse, Silverthorn & Mercado, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
