Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Southern Visions, LLP v. Red Diamond, Inc.
as 21-2003
Appellee:
RED DIAMOND, INC.
Appellant:
SOUTHERN VISIONS, LLP
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd. v. US
as 21-1930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HANGZHOU DEER KING INDUSTRIAL AND TRADING CO., LTD., GUILIN TEBON SUPERHARD MATERIAL CO., LTD., QUANZHOU ZHONGZHI DIAMOND TOOL CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
BOSUN TOOLS CO., LTD. and CHENGDU HUIFENG NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS' COALITION
Bosun Tools Co., Ltd. v. US
as 21-1929
Plaintiff:
DANYANG NYCL TOOLS MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., CHENGDU HUIFENG NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., RIZHAO HEIN SAW CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS' COALITION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BOSUN TOOLS CO., LTD.
Baca v. US
as 21-127
Respondent:
DAVID BELL, MATTHEW CRUMRINE, KEVIN BEINE and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Avalos v. US
as 21-119
Respondent:
THOMAS RHINEHART, JR., JASON DIGNAN, JOSEPH AUGUSTA and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Diamond Sawblades v. US
as 20-1478
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
BOSUN TOOLS CO., LTD.
DIAMOND et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
NORMAN DOUGLAS DIAMOND and ZAIDA GOLENA DEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
USA
DIAMOND et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00358
Plaintiff:
NORMAN DOUGLAS DIAMOND and ZAIDA GOLENA DEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
OUTDOOR VENTURE CORP. v. USA
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
OUTDOOR VENTURE CORP.
Defendant:
USA
Movant:
DIAMOND BRAND PRODUCTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
REEDHYCALOG V DIAMOND INNOVATIONS
as 11-1010
Defendant-Appellant:
Diamond Innovations, Inc., Diamond Innovations, Inc., Diamond Innovations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
ReedHycalog LP, ReedHycalog UK, Ltd., ReedHycalog LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
