Cases 11 - 20 of 239
Garza v. Salazar
as 5:2022cv01313
Petitioner:
Gilbert Diaz Garza
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rankin v. Cozby et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Elton Rankin, Jr
Defendant:
Jennifer Cozby, Dakota Thornton, Evelyn Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. Diaz et al
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant:
Misty Diaz, Chris Weston, Craig Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz III v. Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Angel L Diaz III
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office, K-9 Unit, Sheriff on Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urioste v. Say et al
as 5:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Mark Urioste
Defendant:
Scott Say, Benjamin Diaz, Felix Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Satchel v. Say et al
as 5:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Satchel, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Say, Benjamin Diaz, Felix Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00130
Petitioner:
Manuel Diaz
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Garza v. Martinez et al
as 5:2022cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Diaz Garza
Defendant:
Marco Martinez, Andy Diaz Garza and Judith Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zuniga-Diaz v. United States Of America
as 2:2022cv00088
Petitioner:
Jose Edwin Zuniga-Diaz
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Adam Diaz
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
