Cases 1 - 10 of 1,874
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singleton v. Jennings et al
as 3:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Dirk Singleton
Defendant:
Chad Jennings, Medical Director and Dentist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
ATTIA v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04778
Plaintiff:
SAHAR ATTIA
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Christopher A. Wray, District Director Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nguyen v. Madsen et al
as 1:2024cv04794
Plaintiff:
Van Toan Nguyen
Defendant:
Director at USCIS Kenneth Madsen, Director at USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
