Cases 31 - 40 of 101
Farley v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Casey Farley
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lincoln v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Joshuah Lincoln
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Dennis Peterson
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Ronald Baker
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erickson v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Randall Erickson
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harding v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harding
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Scott Stone
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruett v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Shawn Pruett
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lakic et al v. Idaho Department of Correction, et al.
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Zemina Lakic, Sefika Lakic, Bree Derrick and others
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Director IDOC Josh Tewalt and John Does 1-30
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizzuto v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ross Pizzuto
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Timothy Richardson, RAUL LABRADOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
