Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Padilla v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Omar Padilla
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges-Foote v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kylie Hodges-Foote
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kitrell v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kitrell
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Johnothon Morrison
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B. Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Cody Willard
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Erik Jon Payne
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge David C. Nye, Judge B. Lynn Winmill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laymon v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Berin Laymon
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Morgan
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Casey Farley
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lincoln v. Tewalt
as 1:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Joshuah Lincoln
Defendant:
Director IDOC Josh Tewalt, Judge B Lynn Winmill, Judge David C. Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
