Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hylton v. Decker
as 21-145
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Gabrae Hylton
Hernandez-Aviles v. Decker
as 20-3995
Petitioner:
Noe Hernandez-Aviles
Respondent:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Bernal Gutierrez v. Decker
as 20-3531
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, Carl E. Du Bois, Sheriff of Orange County, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Juan Edgar Bernal Gutierrez
Ferreyra v. Decker
as 20-3437
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Black v. Decker
as 20-3224
Respondent:
Sheriff Carl E. Dubois, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Orange County, New York, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Carol Williams Black
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marco Martinez Roman
Respondent / Appellee:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Grant v. Decker
as 20-2739
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Dudley Grant
Ferreyra v. Decker
as 20-2293
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Barbecho v. Decker
as 20-2207
Petitioner:
Milton Barbecho, Jose Molina, Felipe Diaz Presbot and others
Respondent:
Acting Director Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Arana v. Barr
as 20-2133
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan, United States Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Matthew Albence, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director Thomas Decker, New York Field Office Director for United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Pedro Arana
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
