Cases 11 - 20 of 333
Strieder v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
Karen Marie Strieder
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00268
Petitioner:
Stephen Wayne Richardson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arredondo-Braaten v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
Allen Arredondo-Braaten
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Felix Murphy, III
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berrocal v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Henry B. Berrocal
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv01468
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Cortez
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burks v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01474
Petitioner:
Bobby Ray Burks, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Deante Clay
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
