Cases 31 - 40 of 312
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv01053
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director Of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobson v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Raymond Eugene Dobson
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oatman v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Brian G. Oatman
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, A OR K RODRIGUEZ, B. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kozitzki v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Kozitzki
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Administration, UTMB Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
Lowell Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Lowell Q. Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Director of TDCJ, et al
as 5:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ortiz
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ, NFN Warden Miller and Warden NFN Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tamayo v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01213
Petitioner:
Domingo Tamayo, Jr.
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
