Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Kaddex, LLC v. DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) SUBPOENA TO DISCORD, INC.
as 3:2023mc80062
In Re:
DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) SUBPOENA TO DISCORD, INC.
Petitioner:
Kaddex, LLC
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80010
In Re:
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Discord, Inc.
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80013
In Re:
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Discord, Inc.
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80011
In Re:
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Discord, Inc.
v. In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80012
In Re:
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Discord, Inc.
David Stebbins v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70269
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, KARL POLANO, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
In re DMCA Subpoena to Discord, Inc.
as 3:2022mc80324
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Discord, Inc.
C.U. et al v. Snap Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv07347
Plaintiff:
C.U. and S.U.
Defendant:
Snap Inc., Meta Platforms Inc., Roblox Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Buffalo Patents, LLC v. Discord, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01332
Plaintiff:
Buffalo Patents, LLC
Defendant:
Discord, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
David Stebbins v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70132
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS, KARL POLANO, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY STEBBINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
