Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BURRELL v. ARMEL et al
as 1:2023cv00582
Petitioner:
Donald C. Burrell
Respondent:
Eric Armel, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and The Attorney General Of The State Of Pa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURRELL v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2023cv01253
Petitioner:
DONALD C. BURRELL
Respondent:
ERIC ARMEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMS v. MILLER et al
as 3:2021cv01795
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY J. ADAMS
Respondent:
George Miller, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. MILLER et al
as 2:2021cv04416
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY J. ADAMS
Respondent:
GEORGE MILLER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Galleher v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2015cv00267
Petitioner:
Challan Andrew Galleher
Respondent:
John Wetzel, PA Attorney General, District Attorney for the County of Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPENCER v. ECKER et al
as 2:2014cv04128
Petitioner:
DELOS D. SPENCER
Respondent:
ECKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BRADFORD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
